case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-07-11 03:52 pm

[ SECRET POST #3111 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3111 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[Peaky Blinders - not a repeat]


__________________________________________________



10.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 067 secrets from Secret Submission Post #445.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-07-12 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
I think this is proof that it's futile to have words for each apparent subcategory of drama, because your understanding of the terms is the exact opposite of what I've been believing all these years. I always was told that a kerfluffle was any argument (silly or serious), whereas wank specifically referred to arguments that are silly and eyeroll-worthy to people who aren't invested in them.

Both now seem to be used interchangeably to refer to any and all internet arguments, so I suppose the distinction (if there ever was a true or commonly accepted one) doesn't matter.