case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-07-16 06:17 pm

[ SECRET POST #3116 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3116 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[Fire Emblem: Fates]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Rebecca Black, Friday]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 027 secrets from Secret Submission Post #445.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-07-16 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)
All she did, and rightly so, was say that in this country we have due process, and that people are innocent until they're proven guilty in a court of law and not the court of public opinion.

(Anonymous) 2015-07-16 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)
I think that's true in a legal sense, and I sympathize with the concept that we should try to avoid rushing to judgment.

At the same time, I think we can use our own judgment to reach conclusions. And the concept of innocent until proven guilty is a legal principle not a moral one. And in a case like this where there's an enormous preponderance of evidence, I don't really think there's any problem with reaching a measured conclusion.
chardmonster: (Default)

[personal profile] chardmonster 2015-07-16 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Except most of us aren't in the public eye like she is.

If I say "yeah ____ is probably a rapist" TMZ doesn't pick it up, it doesn't become a major news story, and I don't have paparazzi screaming it in my face. If I somehow prove to be wrong, I'm not going to be vilified in the media or have my career damaged.

So yeah I think she had every right to be cagey.
Edited 2015-07-16 23:53 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2015-07-16 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, sure. I think it's alright if she wants to be cagy or decline to comment, I'm not arguing against that, I'm just saying it's also alright if she wants to come to a conclusion, if you see what I mean.

(Anonymous) 2015-07-17 01:19 am (UTC)(link)
This!