[ SECRET POST #3116 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3116 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[Fire Emblem: Fates]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Rebecca Black, Friday]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 027 secrets from Secret Submission Post #445.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

"Defended" is not really the right word here. In fact, it's distinctly the wrong one. She said she didn't want to rush to judgement without proof. If "failing to rush to judgement without proof" is your definition of "vile, vile woman", then you're the one with a problem.

[(Anonymous)]

Well there's also an argument to be had over what the relevant understanding of 'proof' is.

Hint: 'convicted in a court of law' is probably not great as a sole criterion for proof.