Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-07-16 06:17 pm
[ SECRET POST #3116 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3116 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

[Fire Emblem: Fates]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Rebecca Black, Friday]
__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 027 secrets from Secret Submission Post #445.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-17 06:41 am (UTC)(link)Of course the sphere of public opinion always has its ridiculous moments. And of course if you think there's not enough evidence you should say so. I think the suggestion that there is not enough evidence in this instance is ridiculous and untenable, and I think Cosby has had several opportunities to present his side of the story and it's just not true that the evidence that's present is solely one-sided, but these are arguments that you can make whether or not I think they're wrong. But it is my conviction that they're wrong, and that's just kind of how it is.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-07-17 07:01 am (UTC)(link)No, we mustn't. Saying "I withhold judgement until a greater standard is met" is (Or at least should be) a perfectly acceptable option. But this get's you judged as being on whichever side has the least supporters
I think Cosby has had several opportunities to present his side of the story
And that's just it. Apparently he has presented it. I never heard that. Even the anon above who told me he had already argued publicly for his innocence did not tell me what he said, just that it was obviously bullshit. When TCoPO give this loud a voice to his defence that so many people have not heard it, do you wonder why somone like Whoopi might not be inclinded to use it to make her judgemnet?
but these are arguments that you can make whether or not I think they're wrong.
not according to people saying she is a 'Vile vile woman' She can be wrong in your and my eyes and that's fine. But that is not the extend of what is happening here.