[ SECRET POST #3123 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3123 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 014 secrets from Secret Submission Post #446.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Pet Peeves Thread

[(Anonymous)]

Um....what do you mean. I haven't posted anything about it before. I just thought some people came off really nosy.

It's not that I disagree with what they were saying or their points. But I just felt like the way they went about it comes off nosy.

Re: Pet Peeves Thread

[(Anonymous)]

maybe it wasn't you, but I feel like someone's been bringing up this topic multiple times in the GC since it happened, which is boggling consider the thread imo was not aggressive at all, except for the anon who got pissed off and started wishing death/paralysis on people

Re: Pet Peeves Thread

[(Anonymous)]

I dunno I also felt "you're loved ones will get sick of you and leave you, and they'll be right to. is equally aggressive in a way. Maybe I'm just someone who worried about losing people but that just feels like a rotten thing to say to someone, based on their assumptions.

Re: Pet Peeves Thread

[(Anonymous)]

No one said that though? They said no one is obligated to give you a ride. Not that they'll LEAVE you (where did you get that?), but that they might start denying rides or asking for gas money each time (and they wouldn't be bad people for doing so either).

And no, it is not equally aggressive to that other person, not at all. Especially since the other person was just being bitchy and attacking, whereas people on the other side were just discussing a topic.

DA

[(Anonymous)]

Still, it started out with the anon replyiing practically grilling them on how they get their rides. Maybe you think it's okay, but they were rude. Sorry you can't accept it.

AYRT

[(Anonymous)]

http://fandomsecrets.dreamwidth.org/1252364.html?thread=851396364#cmt851396364

here. Here's my problem with it. Agree disagree I don't care. But I think you're being mighty hypocritical to claim that only ONE side was wrong.

Re: AYRT

[(Anonymous)]

Lol no need to post your reply that's literally right below this.

And only one side was wrong, and that was the jerk who was wishing death/paralysis on others. I don't recall ANY grilling, just general discussing about people who do not drive. Maybe you took it personally, but the "you" was general to the discussion that was happen through the entire comments. No grilling. And even if they did, so what? It's other people who brought it up. If it's a topic of anonymous online discussion then people should be able to talk about it in whatever way they want as long as they refrain from being assholes (which again, only one side did). You don't get to say "I don't drive, I take rides from others and don't compensate them" and then expect people NOT to talk about it.