[ SECRET POST #3128 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3128 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[X-Men]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Hayley Atwell]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Infamous]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Tokyo Mew Mew]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Peep Show]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Rhett & Link/Good Mythical Morning]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Brooklyn Nine Nine]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Lava]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Steven Universe]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 071 secrets from Secret Submission Post #447.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

And if a gay person made a video about two gay volcanoes, they'd have two fat crusty volcanoes. If a lesbian made a movie about lesbian volcanoes, both of them would look distinctly feminine. The reason we don't have those is because gay isn't deemed acceptable for kids yet, and that's a separate issue.

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

But if it was acceptable for Disney shorts to be about gay volcanoes and lesbian volcanoes, people wouldn't be reacting this negatively to straight volcanoes and straight umbrellas. Most people aren't objecting to gendering objects in general, just objecting to the fact that whenever it happens, it always seems to be one of the objects being given stereotypically feminine traits so that there can be no mistaking them for anything but straight.

[(Anonymous)]

lmao it's not a separate issue at all, that's precisely the problem people are bringing up