case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-07-29 06:43 pm

[ SECRET POST #3129 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3129 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 026 secrets from Secret Submission Post #447.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Worst character interpretation you've ever seen?

(Anonymous) 2015-07-30 02:55 am (UTC)(link)
NAYRT but I think a lot of people just write Steve as essentially the most sexually desirable man possible, in the same way that I think a lot of people write Darcy as a generic female reader / writer stand-in

(And I like Darcy/Steve as a ship...)

Re: Worst character interpretation you've ever seen?

(Anonymous) 2015-07-30 03:07 am (UTC)(link)
I think he is the most sexually desirable man possible, but for me the inexperience is part of it, lol.