[ SECRET POST #3129 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3129 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 026 secrets from Secret Submission Post #447.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Worst character interpretation you've ever seen?

[(Anonymous)]

I'm really glad that I've never seen the third one. Do a lot of authors use it to set up Steve/Tony or something so that Steve can be ~rescued~? Or is it typically used in just straight up non-con fic?

Re: Worst character interpretation you've ever seen?

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

It used to be a thing that some Steve/Tony writers did to set up Steve/Tony and to woobify Tony. It was pretty much a genre of its own pre-TWS. This was back when 90% of the Steve/Bucky tag was fic where Bucky was either Steve's dead ex ot Steve's abusive ex to set up Steve/Tony, and the bad taste it left has stayed with me.