[ SECRET POST #3129 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3129 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 026 secrets from Secret Submission Post #447.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Worst character interpretation you've ever seen?

[(Anonymous)]

So what would be wrong with writing them as irredeemable assholes, since that's what they are in the movies? They are two separate canons, and at very least, in the movies, they are pretty much villains.

Re: Worst character interpretation you've ever seen?

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Well, that's up for debate if they're irredeemable assholes in the movie; I didn't see it that way and I know many others who feel the same way. And there's nothing wrong with writing them that way but it's still bad characterization. They're not villains. They're antagonists.

You seem weirdly defensive about this.