case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-08-02 03:57 pm

[ SECRET POST #3133 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3133 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[The Guild]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Harvest Moon: (More) Friends of Mineral Town]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Gump, from Legend]


__________________________________________________



05.
(Agent Carter)


__________________________________________________



06.
[Jeeves and Wooster]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Lupin III]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Courtney Love & Kurt Cobain]


__________________________________________________



09.
(SPN)


__________________________________________________



10.
[Kasumi Goto, Mass Effect]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 057 secrets from Secret Submission Post #448.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
chardmonster: (Default)

Sorry I saw this late!

[personal profile] chardmonster 2015-08-03 03:13 am (UTC)(link)
I consider myself a historian already--I have a masters in the subject and I'm going to defend my dissertation this fall. So I consider myself an expert on my particular field based on having formal training and being acknowledged as one by people with more experience than myself. Basically I base it on

1. Formal training
2. A lot of experience
3. Acceptance by other experts

You can replace 1 with a whole lot of 2--I wouldn't say a local history person who happens not to have had formal schooling but knows the ins and outs of the field and has been working for years doesn't count as a "real expert." However you can't really replace #3.

However, please note that "expert" is just a sort of informal certification. Someone not being an "expert" doesn't mean they don't know a whole lot.

Re: Sorry I saw this late!

(Anonymous) 2015-08-03 05:44 pm (UTC)(link)
This is a good distinction. Though, to be fair, I think a lot of it can be circumstantial, especially in regards to formal training, but even regards to the "acceptance by experts" bit because both acceptance and experts sort of need defining on their own. Generally, if you're involved and familiar with the literature in your field (I don't think just being familiar with the primary sources is enough), and have a publication under your belt, that helps.