case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-08-02 03:57 pm

[ SECRET POST #3133 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3133 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[The Guild]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Harvest Moon: (More) Friends of Mineral Town]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Gump, from Legend]


__________________________________________________



05.
(Agent Carter)


__________________________________________________



06.
[Jeeves and Wooster]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Lupin III]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Courtney Love & Kurt Cobain]


__________________________________________________



09.
(SPN)


__________________________________________________



10.
[Kasumi Goto, Mass Effect]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 057 secrets from Secret Submission Post #448.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: What makes someone an "expert"?

[personal profile] chardmonster 2015-08-03 03:19 am (UTC)(link)
>Because there are A LOT of books about history not written by historians

A lot of them are shit. The problem with history is that it can be very political, very emotional, or both. So people seek out stuff that isn't quite true, emphasizes the less important thing, or is flat out wrong, but makes them feel good. And there's a huge market for this.

However, some of the books about history written by non-historians are really good! And if you work on a subject for years you can get good enough to be a historian. What you need to do is look at how other historians review the work--that is, multiple historians.

But there's no certification for a historian, so it's always going to be kind of nebulous. If I get a job outside my field and don't return to it for years and don't write any history, I'm not going to be calling myself a "historian" anymore because it'd feel silly.