case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-08-10 06:50 pm

[ SECRET POST #3141 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3141 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 066 secrets from Secret Submission Post #449.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-08-10 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know why anyone takes the "snitch" scar so seriously. In canon it wasn't given nearly the seriousness it would have gotten if it had happened in real life. Like many things in HP it was just supposed to be a cartoonishly humorous part of the series' tone. Relax.

(Anonymous) 2015-08-10 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Except that facial scarring is a thing commonly used to humiliate and degrade women. It was a very unfortunate choice, and Rowling's subsequent post-canon pronouncements on it have made it much worse.

(Anonymous) 2015-08-11 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
da

okay, but she also used scarring to humiliate the male characters. it's not a case of sexism.

(Anonymous) 2015-08-11 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
Context. Scars on a man are often considered sexy, or at least showing character. Scars on a woman are used to degrade and humiliate. Context always matters, you troll.

(Anonymous) 2015-08-11 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
NAYRT but it seems that your issue here is that you want to lock in one specific contextual variable, and then utterly disregard all other context

(Anonymous) 2015-08-11 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
Lol when have Harry Potter's scars EVER been considered sexy? His forehead one and the degrading one on his hand?

oh come on it's no fun when the troll calls you a troll...
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-08-11 02:08 am (UTC)(link)
this is not a good time to call someone a troll. Someone you disagree with isn't a troll. Stop watering down the word even more than it already is.