case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-08-14 07:04 pm

[ SECRET POST #3145 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3145 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Girl With all the Gifts/She Who Brings Gifts]


__________________________________________________



02.
[Hannibal]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Rookie Blue]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Gakuen Alice]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.
[Linkara, Atop the Fourth Wall]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Rookie Blue]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Dawes, "Things Happen"]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Yukigumi, Sagiri Seina & Sakihi Miyu]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Brooklyn Nine-Nine]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Good Omens]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Arrested Development]


__________________________________________________



13. http://i.imgur.com/FckwG6x.jpg
[The Walking Dead (possibly spoilers), linked for gore (not real, but TV/Walking Dead-realism)]


__________________________________________________



14. [SPOILERS for M:I - Rogue Nation]



__________________________________________________



15. [SPOILERS for Warbreaker]



__________________________________________________



16. [WARNING for "NSFW, Nudity, forced kink, general fuckeduppery"]
http://s9.postimg.org/bzl9zbv3j/fs_pparc_twnsfw_twnudity_twgeneralfuckeduppery.jpg
[Hunter x Hunter; linked because ? nudity/abuse/or something? and I'm not really sure what's going on here]


__________________________________________________



17. [WARNING for rape]

[The Phantom Of The Opera, James Barbour]


__________________________________________________



18. [WARNING for rape]

[Lupin III - The Woman Called Fujiko Mine]


__________________________________________________



19. [WARNING for death]



__________________________________________________



20. [SPOILERS for the Talos Principle]
[WARNING for suicide]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #449.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Fandom Schadenfreude

(Anonymous) 2015-08-15 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
You really don't think that her friend would have read the typed answer BACK to her though?

I mean, her friend was clearly asking Nichelle the questions and then typing up her responses. I see no reason why, if Nichelle could understand the questions and answer to them that she couldn't correct her friend in any response.

Plus, I mean, her responses are STILL on reddit. It's not like it would be difficult to go back and clarify if she really had an issue. Especially since that response was one of her most upvoted AND she answered a follow-up question.

The follow-up question, especially, makes me really doubt that she was improperly transcribed considering the person said:

"Thanks so much for the response! I've always thought it felt ham-fisted. It's nice to know you agree."

I mean...the person basically said "Thanks for agreeing that it's ham-fisted." and that's what Nichelle responded to.

Re: Fandom Schadenfreude

(Anonymous) 2015-08-15 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
You really don't think that her friend would have read the typed answer BACK to her though?

I could believe it, tbh. Like I said, even people with good intentions...

Until Nichelle is on film again and repeats what she said on Reddit, I don't feel too bad about not taking her AMA as 100% gospel. There are too many layers until you get back to her, vs. the videos where she's front and center, and the one speaking. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Re: Fandom Schadenfreude

(Anonymous) 2015-08-15 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
The follow-up question though makes it REALLY hard for me to believe that she wasn't okay with what was conveyed.

Either way, it's nice for me because at least now Spuhura fans will know what it feels like.
insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

Re: Fandom Schadenfreude

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2015-08-15 02:40 am (UTC)(link)
Lets be honest. You just really don't want it to be true and you are rationalizing.

It's reached a pathetic level.

Re: Fandom Schadenfreude

(Anonymous) 2015-08-15 07:54 am (UTC)(link)
Whereas the people who believe that this negates all of Nichols' past statements about Spock/Uhura because they dislike the ship and like seeing its fans upset have no ulterior motive?

Re: Fandom Schadenfreude

(Anonymous) 2015-08-15 11:55 am (UTC)(link)
+1

Re: Fandom Schadenfreude

(Anonymous) 2015-08-15 02:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, dude, I'm curious to know how do YOU rationalize someone writing a comment on her behalf that completely and utterly contraddicts things like this:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lQrHIQhvWNo
Transcript of key part:

"Gene said, and I was sharing this with George the other day, when I told him that I thought of Spock as my mentor. Because if you remember Uhura was the only one he was able to teach the Vulcan lyre too and he sang and spooffed on Spock. Now, you could have never had a love scene in 63 between Uhura and Spock but there were several hints and Gene was one in the kind of beginning to follow that"

Seriously?
If people like OP, who no doubt has ulterior motives, can take the reddit chat at face value all the while ignoring anything else she said, I don't think it's pathetic or reaching for other fans take that comment with a grain of salt because it really does sound over the top contraddictory with everything she had said before.

Re: Fandom Schadenfreude

(Anonymous) 2015-08-15 01:46 pm (UTC)(link)
That 'any serious fan' comment is not like her, sounds more like one of the overzealous fanboys that post on trek fanboards, tbh. I think that made people suspect it wasn't really her and her friend was overstepping a bit.
Let's be honest,
you are free to take the comment at face value but others are free to take it with a grain of salt and it's quite reasonable for them to do that since it really does sound over the top contraddictory with everything she had said before.
Nichelle is unlikely to get back there and read everything and make corrections anyway. Idk if you know it but she doesn't even write over her own twitter account and she once said she didn't like to use computers, and that was before the stroke.

I'm sorry but I think it's shitty you take this comment at face value but apparently don't think that videos with her saying the opposite thing count as that being her opinion?