[ SECRET POST #3149 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3149 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 071 secrets from Secret Submission Post #450.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Sexual compatibilty

[(Anonymous)]

It's always surprising to me how anybody can believe something like that.

Like, legitimately, it just doesn't make sense to me. Until you have evidence that something is true about yourself, shouldn't you adopt an agnostic point of view? How do you live for any length of time at all, and not come to understand the way that the experience of actually doing a thing can be dramatically different from the way it looks from outside? What kind of benefit is there to thinking this way? It's so strange to me.

Re: Sexual compatibilty

[fingalsanteater]

Someone just started on their philosophy degree it seems.

I don't need to have evidence to know something is true about myself (???) to have both experience in understanding others points of view and experience in the subject I'm speaking upon. Meaning I know for a fact that society expects men to be very sexually active ( this isn't even up debate) and I know for a fact that men will lie about their sexual experience and level of desire because they are embarrassed to not be "normal."

Re: Sexual compatibilty

[(Anonymous)]

Er, sorry, I'm not sure whether you're criticizing me for being too wordy (in which case fair enough - it's what I do when I'm not thinking about my posts) or whether you think that I'm criticizing you. If it's the second thing, I should clarify that I was wondering about why the men you were talking about do the thing you were talking about, not why you were expressing an opinion about them. I agree with you that men do this thing, it's just never made sense to me why they do it. Sorry if I didn't make that clear!

and, I mean, I get that on some level it's psychological and societal-expectations, but it just seems so obviously fallacious and self-defeating. And if it's a conscious lie, it's just so obviously going to be proved wrong that it just seems pointless.

Re: Sexual compatibilty

[fingalsanteater]

Okay, yeah, I get you now. I was misunderstanding your previous post.

Some people believe a lot of things about themselves that are not true, including that they would enjoy having sex very often.