Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-08-18 06:49 pm
[ SECRET POST #3149 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3149 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 071 secrets from Secret Submission Post #450.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-19 12:15 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-19 02:09 pm (UTC)(link)No, because AO3 has guidelines for how to write relationship tags. And those are Alice/Bob, not "Alob". Portmanteau ship names on AO3 are obsolete because at most, the tag wranglers connect them to the actual ship tag so that in essence, every fic tagged "Alob" is also tagged Alice/Bob in the backend, making searches for "Alob" and Alice/Bob yield the exact same results, at worst they're just uselessly bloating the list of AO3 tags.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-08-19 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)But if people searching for that pairing are gonna search for Alob and not Alice/Bob, it makes sense to have an Alob tag, because Alice/Bob isn't gonna get tagged as Alob on the backend. Basically, it doesn't matter that they yield the same results, because if your readers are gonna be searching for one and not the other, you should tag for the one that isn't gonna be automatically tagged on the backend.