case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-08-26 07:04 pm

[ SECRET POST #3157 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3157 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #451.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-08-27 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
Episode III was a mess because Episodes I and II were fractured catastrophes without conflict. Of the three of them at least Episode III had an explicit conflict with actual tension to it on the screen. Whether or not you cared about it or it was a good conflict that made best use of the characters by that point is another matter entirely.

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos 2015-08-27 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
I think Episode III had great ideas. Unfortunately George's tin ear for dialogue and performance made it feel like undergrad Macbeth. That is reasonable if you're doing a small-studio art piece, but not when you have Oz, Lee, McGregor, Portman, and McDiarmid on your cast.

Compare any of the Lucas-directed and written episodes to Empire Strikes Back, a Kasdan/Kershner film. Kershner's instinct to let Fisher and Ford develop the nuances of their performance in rehearsal rather than micromanaging them paid off.