case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-09-02 06:45 pm

[ SECRET POST #3164 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3164 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 040 secrets from Secret Submission Post #452.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Links

(Anonymous) 2015-09-03 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
Still makes it incorrect to characterize their response as "the only reason anyone disagrees with us is they're a bigot"

Also if your response is measured they're clearly not talking about you

Re: Links

(Anonymous) 2015-09-03 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
True, I'll give you that. It implies more that non-transphobes made "arguments against" and a vast majority of other people made "attacks" on the authors.

But I'm willing to bet a good amount of money that they took anyone who replied with "this is idiotic" and nothing more as an attack against them and the idea and the idea of trans-ness, and not perfectly justified eyerolling at their dramatic, sensationalized headline claiming fact and truth that needs to be dealt with.