[ SECRET POST #3168 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3168 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Criminal Minds]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Community]


__________________________________________________



04.
(Harry Potter, Yu-Gi-Oh)


__________________________________________________



05.
[JerryC]


__________________________________________________



06.
[J.K. Rowling/Harry Potter]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Kingdom Hearts: Dream Drop Distance]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Hatfields & McCoys]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Proof]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Brooklyn Nine Nine]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Scarlett Johansson]


__________________________________________________



12.
[No Escape]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 065 secrets from Secret Submission Post #453.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

DA

I also don't have a dog in this hunt (I just can't relate to the RPF concept--I'm old, IDK) here's my question: Aren't you limiting yourself, in doing this? I mean, if you're imagining some epic scenario in your head, and suddenly X becomes OOC because you're stuck on one guy/girl/robot IDK.

(Wait, doesn't everybody flip around age/hair colour/eye colour/mannerisms/biology/clothing/location/etc of their pretend people in their pretend universes as need be/if you get bored with it/them? No? Just me? okey then *slinks away*)

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

No? I strive to keep my characters in-character. I don't write for plot. I set up scenarios and write characters that I enjoy, to see what happens and see what they decide to do.

[(Anonymous)]

"in-character"

[(Anonymous)]

You know, to be a sarcastic asshole, I wrote a big honking disclaimer about the character of an actor vs the actor's actual character in the middle of that comment, but I thought that would come across as rude. Clearly it's necessary because some of you can't actually read context. I will dumb shit down for you in the future, don't worry.

[(Anonymous)]

"character of an actor vs the actor's actual character"

because we definitely know there is a difference lmao

[(Anonymous)]

OK, troll. I'm not going to respond to you anymore.

[(Anonymous)]

How am I trolling, that is a legitimate concern. Oh wait, it's not a concern because if someone is actually sincere in front of a camera, it's not your fault or your problem. I forgot.

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Re: How are you trolling: the "lmao" was a dead giveaway, TBH

[(Anonymous)]

does this go for people logged in who say lmao because I can think of a few who say that