case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-09-07 06:15 pm

[ SECRET POST #3169 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3169 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 053 secrets from Secret Submission Post #453.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: A pointless but interesting realization I had

(Anonymous) 2015-09-08 01:55 pm (UTC)(link)
For what it's worth, if two siblings have sex and have a baby, that baby has less of a chance of having any kind of deformity than a woman who has a baby at 45. Also apparently parent-child incest has a higher chance of such than a sibling-incest baby.

The more you know, I guess. I rather think that's not the point anyway. Incest is dangerous for reasons that aren't potential babies, I don't think babies should be brought into the discussion at all. It kind of suggests that same-sex incest relationships or relationships using a condom are somehow less problematic just because there's no potential pregnancy.