Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-09-11 07:06 pm
[ SECRET POST #3173 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3173 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

[Detroit Metal City]
__________________________________________________
06.

(Gravity Falls, Criminal Minds)
__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08. [SPOILERS for X-Files (new series)]

__________________________________________________
09. [SPOILERS for Sly Cooper 4: Thieves In Time]

__________________________________________________
10. [SPOILERS for Mass Effect 2]

__________________________________________________
11. [SPOILERS for Steven Universe]

__________________________________________________
12. [WARNING for sexual assault]

[Chrissie Hynde of The Pretenders]
__________________________________________________
13. [WARNING for rape and assault]

[Hockey RPF]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #453.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Stupid questions.
(Anonymous) 2015-09-12 12:12 am (UTC)(link)I'm not saying they are, but you asked what I'd call him and I answered I'd call him a thief. A thief is what he is and has no problems with being, and iPhones are what he steals. I wouldn't trust a person like that with any of my belongings, because who knows when he'll decide he wants something else?The important information to get across is that he is a thief, and focusing on the iPhone part dilutes that message in that scenario.
Re: Stupid questions.
(Anonymous) 2015-09-12 12:17 am (UTC)(link)Similarly, if you are a woman, perhaps a woman with an abusive past (since they can be vulnerable targets), wouldn't it be important information to know "this guy specifically abuses women"? Yes, "he's an abuser" might be good enough, but it might also be too vague. I think the way to phrase things depends on your perspective.