[ SECRET POST #3173 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3173 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[Detroit Metal City]


__________________________________________________



06.
(Gravity Falls, Criminal Minds)


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for X-Files (new series)]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Sly Cooper 4: Thieves In Time]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Mass Effect 2]




__________________________________________________



11. [SPOILERS for Steven Universe]



__________________________________________________



12. [WARNING for sexual assault]

[Chrissie Hynde of The Pretenders]


__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for rape and assault]

[Hockey RPF]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #453.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Fanfic Feedback Guidelines Chart

[(Anonymous)]

Well, I agree with the chart that there is no universal rule of what writers want to hear, but I hate that people have become so touchy that it seems there must be rules and disclaimers for every kind of interaction anywhere.

But while it might be a handy-dandy resource in an author's profile for those who do care, I think it would still be the brat-authors and brat-reviewers who would drive the discussion on this debate. Ample entitlement exists on both sides of the reader/reviewer equation.

And, as for your question about concrit, I don't think it's an either/or. Proofreading and grammar checks are immensely useful, for those annoying typos, or consistently misspelled words. Pointed characterization questions are also fair game, although probably the skill and maturity of the author is going to come into play with that.

For my part, I welcome any reviews, and yes, I even leave the negative ones up. So someone didn't like it - so what? I like getting kudos. But I do adore thoughtful reviews, where you can tell that someone really thought about your story, even if I don't always agree with the conclusions the reviewer makes.

Anyway, tl;dr - interesting idea. Probably doomed to failure, though.