case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-09-12 03:15 pm

[ SECRET POST #3174 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3174 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 084 secrets from Secret Submission Post #454.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-09-12 08:29 pm (UTC)(link)
nayrt

Language. Victorian prose is, to varying degrees, more florid florid and wordy that contemporary prose tends to be. It also has a touch more formality in how phrases are structured, and "fancier" words (including now-antiquated words) are more likely to be used. At worse, it can sounded stilted and pompous to modern "ears."

Which I guess is what you mean by "style," but there are definite stylistic differences, and these would definitely be noticeable in a fanfic.
dreemyweird: (Default)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2015-09-12 09:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I've already kind of answered this post when talking to the anon above, but also:

this, as that same anon has pointed out, a generalization, NOT a statement of a "definite difference" between modern and Victorian lit. There is not a distinct line between the two, which is what I was saying in the beginning.

(Anonymous) 2015-09-13 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
da

I think the point is that when your average person thinks about Victorian lit, they associate it with stereotypes like florid prose, formal language, etc. So although there's no distinct line between normal and Victorian lit, authors who write "fic stylised as Victorian lit" are usually writing based on those stereotypes, rather than attempting to write a thoughtful or well-researched pastiche. Those fics are thusly full of clumsily executed florid prose and crude attempts at making the dialogue sound formal and old, which is likely part of why OP doesn't find them to be readable.
dreemyweird: (Default)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2015-09-13 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, I agree with this. I mean, I'm not even going to deny that there's a reason these stereotypes exist, and that there's some truth to them. But they do not accurately reflect reality or make a good basis for pastiches.

You're probably right about the OP's issues with Victorian-esque fandom stuff, too. I just flared up a little because I dislike the idea the stuffing of different literary eras into neat separate boxes. Plus, I really like good pastiches.