case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-09-12 03:15 pm

[ SECRET POST #3174 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3174 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 084 secrets from Secret Submission Post #454.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: LGBT

(Anonymous) 2015-09-13 04:56 pm (UTC)(link)
There was NO concept of exclusive female homosexuality at that time, so no. You're incorrect. "Lesbian" being derived from "the classics" (sort of) hardly matters, words just describe things, and both male homosexual acts and female homosexual acts have been known about for quite a long time. and what the hell, anyway, is your point?