Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-09-18 06:52 pm
[ SECRET POST #3180 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3180 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
10. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
11. [WARNING for domestic violence/abuse]

[The Musketeers]
__________________________________________________
12. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
13. [WARNING for rape]

[Babylon 5]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #454.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
http://i.imgur.com/p5mvpIq.png
[The Musketeers]
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-09-18 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-09-18 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 02:55 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 02:42 am (UTC)(link)I never really quite grasped what the show was going for: on the one hand, it let Constance spell out in very clear terms that she a) wasn't ready, and b) had to protect her reputation, and yet ultimately the narrative seemed to side with D'artagan.
Even weirder: that Doctor Lemay understood Constance's hesitation when he proposed (saying that perhaps it was too soon after her husband's death) AND the entire season revolved around how tenuous the Queen's reputation was.
Talk about moral dissonance.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 08:43 am (UTC)(link)Related, my headcanon for why there are no guests at the wedding safe for a few musketeers is that Constance' reputation is in fact ruined to the point where people cross the street to avoid her and her family has disowned her. Sorry, but she made out with her lover in public, said lover probably murdered M. Bonacieux (he literally had his blood on his hands, still fresh, when he told Constance of his death, and I as a random gossipy judgemental Parisienne am supposed to believe that wild story about a royal assassin? sure Jan.gif), and they got married before the soil on poor late Bonacieux's grave had even settled.
And building on that, of course the French nobles at court have no love for Anne. She insulted, humiliated, and disrespected them by picking this lowly merchant's wife for her lady in waiting rather than giving the position to someone of appropriate standing and political value. And she did it at the behest of some soldier (who is buddies with who later turns out to be *her* lover), so he could commit the crime of adultery with his married lover. This decision of Anne's lacks even a hint of political savvy ad makes her seem like a thoughtless, loose-moralled fool. Of course the French despise the Spanish queen, don't want her to have any influence at court, and think she herself is quite capable of sleeping around with a soldier, too.
The show can't on some occasions point out Constance and Anne's complicated situations and how they are bound by social conventions and political requirements of their time and positions, and then at other times blithely ignore all the implications and consequences their actions and behavior should be expected to have in that society.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-09-20 06:57 pm (UTC)(link)