[ SECRET POST #3180 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3180 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for rape]




__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for domestic violence/abuse]

[The Musketeers]


__________________________________________________



12. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for rape]

[Babylon 5]









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #454.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Does fandom as a whole actually WANT variety in its fic?

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

I would like to see this research of yours. Do you have any empirical data? Has your research been peer-reviewed?

:P

Re: Does fandom as a whole actually WANT variety in its fic?

[herpymcderp]

What are you doing stop it. Stop making me want to publish something on this.

I bet you there's some dumb little niche journal out there that would absolutely eat this up.

Re: Does fandom as a whole actually WANT variety in its fic?

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

I know I would eat it up! Academic studies of fandom things are so much fun.