[ SECRET POST #3180 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3180 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for rape]




__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for domestic violence/abuse]

[The Musketeers]


__________________________________________________



12. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for rape]

[Babylon 5]









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #454.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Isolationism

[(Anonymous)]

It depends on what you mean by isolationism. A policy of complete withdrawal from the world is practically impossible. But I think when most people talk about isolationism, they're referring to a more limited policy - basically, not fucking with other countries' affairs in a military and political sense, not spending a lot of time dealing with international organizations, stuff like that. Obviously, you have to have some kind of diplomatic engagement with the world. You have to maintain relationships with other countries, you have to have trade links, you have to pay a modicum of respect to the UN, etc.

However - in a specifically American context - while I would be comfortable with a less active and more neutral American foreign policy, at the end of the day, there is a reason isolationism is a minority view. Because it's almost always beneficial to try to maintain regional balances of power and to try to aid allies almost anywhere in the world. It's just really hard to argue that isolationism is better for American interests, under almost any definition. I think the minimum you can argue for is off-shore balancing, from an interests perspective. And so then you have to try to make a moral argument, and as we all know, that has not historically been a very strong argument in foreign policy.