case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-09-19 03:49 pm

[ SECRET POST #3181 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3181 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #455.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 09:14 pm (UTC)(link)
How concerned exactly are these series, Captain America included, with historical accuracy? I'm gonna go ahead and state that accuracy is not their number one priority. After all, we're talking about superheroes with superpowers. I'm pretty sure we can sort out a situation where a female Captain America was possible. Likewise, Holmes is basically a "superpowered" genius. Why couldn't the character be a woman? It's still fiction, and it's not like women were kept locked away in towers back then, or ever.

(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)
>Much of Holmes as a character and Holmes as stories is wrapped up in the era he's from, and those came with certain circumstances and roles. Female Captain America is harder for me to swallow for the same reason

>Could someone do it, yeah, why not? How much of it is going to be accurate to the original, I don't know.

I think I already addressed that.

Something being hard for me personally to swallow is neither a judgment nor an insistence that things be done my way, don't get offended.

(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 09:23 pm (UTC)(link)
NAYRT

They don't really sound offended.

(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, sorry, I meant something more like

"No offense, but something being hard for me personally to swallow is neither a judgment nor an insistence that things be done my way, don't get offended."

As a response to "why couldn't it be a woman?" It can. Sure. Why not? I said that already.

(Anonymous) 2015-09-19 09:28 pm (UTC)(link)
SA

"No offense, but something being hard for me personally to swallow is neither a judgment nor an insistence that things be done my way."*

My brain is on the fritz today.