[ SECRET POST #3181 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3181 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #455.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I think it has to do more with the shock of its sudden appearance on everybody's radar, combined with the very distinctive visuals of a nuclear blast. Other types of WMD were more "familiar".
Also, there have been strong campaigns about memory that stress the horrors of nuclear warfare specifically, and probably the Cold War and that feeling of "nuclear doom" hanging above the world helped cement it.

While obviously I think all forms of WMDs are horrifying, I do personally think the major damage of the nuclear bomb in comparison to others is environmental.
I don't know enough about modern weaponry, but it could be that it's also more destruction in a small package than other things? Though probably by now there are plenty of things like it.

Like you say, it's the nuance people are missing. From what I've learned, the US /was/ a bit trigger happy when it came to using it, and there were definite political aspects to ending the war just then - specifically edging the Soviet Union out of influencing Japan after the war, because it was pretty clear that Japan would lose one way or another. But this is only one aspect of the issue, and there were many more factors to take into account. Like the Japanese still being willing to fight, ongoing losses, I mean the Koreans weren't free yet either, and every year Japan was occupying them was doing more damage, and like you say the US-USSR conflict.

Ugh, that claim about the US dropping it on Japan and not Germany because of racism just makes me so angry.