case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-09-20 03:54 pm

[ SECRET POST #3182 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3182 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 059 secrets from Secret Submission Post #455.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-09-22 04:08 am (UTC)(link)
I disagree, and so does this article, which tallies the screen time each character in the first Avengers movie got.

http://www.vulture.com/2012/05/how-much-screen-time-does-each-avenger-get.html#

Turns out, Steve gets more screen time than Tony (though by a very narrow margin), and Natasha gets only slightly less screen time, but it's she who has the most unbroken dialogue scenes of all of them.

If you add up all the character's combined minutes of screen time, as estimated by this article, and then calculate what percentage of the pie movie each character got, it looks like this:

22% Steve
21% Tony
19% Natasha
16% Bruce
15% Thor
7% Hawkeye

That sure doesn't look like The Tony Show to me. Also, notably, it was Bruce/The Hulk - not Tony - whose lines seem to have gotten the biggest audience reaction.

Admittedly, this is one quick two-person observational study done for the purpose of fun, not science. It's not hard evidence of anything. However, it is somewhat less subjective and somewhat more data based than simply one or a bunch of people saying, "To me the movie seemed like this."