Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-09-21 07:11 pm
[ SECRET POST #3183 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3183 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 047 secrets from Secret Submission Post #455.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-09-22 12:47 am (UTC)(link)Agreed. Anytime someone says they shouldn't put something on the internet all I can think is, "Yeah, and you didn't have to keep reading it."
I completely agree with your rant about people being dicks in general. Criticism is obviously good and valuable for writers. And no, it won't be pretty or sugarcoated. But there is a VAST difference between actual tough, honest criticism and people just being flat out jerks, and too many people do not seem to know the difference.
no subject
Also to be honest, the fact is the younger people are going to be more "oversensitive" than grown adults (I live with a 12 year old, I know this very well), and surrounding sound advice with too much snark and mockery likely to put people on the defense is honestly a dumb move on the reviewer's part. Like if you're being overtly accusatory in your criticism, that's going to get someone defensive.
Rather than complain about how people can't take a bunch of snarking and barbs about how this and that is "lol stupid" and "Mary Sue , kill it with fire", why can't people just rethink how they say things.
I think that the internet and the way people communicate on the internet is a very different set of social rules than in 'meatspace'. New writers won't be used to that, and where they're coming from a bunch of rudeness is probably shocking and offensive.
Like I'm not denying that some people can be oversensitive but when a person's first approach is very accusing and sarcastic, they'll never know if the person might be otherwise receptive if the advice were given differently.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-09-22 03:54 am (UTC)(link)You're also right that tone can be VERY tough to tell sometimes over the internet, too, and even if a person means well, and snark is just their particular way of communicating, like you said, not everyone knows that.
I know that some people have that rule that they don't say things in cyberspace they wouldn't say to someone's face, and I think that should apply to everyone's internet conduct. We may not be able to see who we're talking to, but there's still real people on the other side of the screen and they should be treated the way you'd treat anyone you interacted with in person. I don't get why that's that hard for some people to do.
no subject
Hell,I misread comments online every other day. It's become a habit for me to show something to my friends and be like "am I the only one bugged by this" or "am I reading this wrong?" before replying.
I think a lot of people have gotten used to a certain amount of freedom from social rules of politeness online, and start to take it for granted.