case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-09-21 07:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #3183 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3183 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 047 secrets from Secret Submission Post #455.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-09-22 06:09 am (UTC)(link)
I think your interpretaton comes from a place of reading each character like a fully realised person, and AYRT's interpretation comes from a place of reading women characters like checklists of things that are fine and things that are wrong terrible for the purposes of testing if they're good enough characters or if the writers are bad people who feminists should throw stones at - and the pass grade on this test is 100%

(Anonymous) 2015-09-22 06:29 am (UTC)(link)
Wow…you sound incredibly defensive and bitter that I just happen to wish that Natasha's AoU plot line had been more Natasha-focused instead of revolving around Bruce's issues.

Heck, I don't even mind that Bruce's issues were addressed but why can't Natasha's problems be at the forefront. Why can't we have Bruce being shown to help her deal with losing her covers, for instance?

Just a thought...
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-09-23 02:29 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think that's a fair assessment in this particular case.