[ SECRET POST #3185 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3185 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 025 secrets from Secret Submission Post #455.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[forgottenjester]

I tried to give him the benefit of a doubt but in all honesty the way he talks about the girl (For example: as an object to with as he wishes) really strips that explanation from my mind as a possibility.

You weren't the only one to come to the conclusion. I just discarded it as plausible.

[(Anonymous)]

This.

The way he says; "Can I have your daughter for the rest of my life?" is just not romantic to me at all. First, you don't get to HAVE anyone, ew. And second, she's not her father's to give away, old fashioned or not.

[(Anonymous)]

+1

[diet_poison]

And second, she's not her father's to give away, old fashioned or not.

.......this is literally the whole point of why this thread frustrates me yet everyone seems to be defending it. Everyone seems to be saying that she IS his to give away and he doesn't have to do it so the narrator needs to go away.

[diet_poison]

I feel like all he really said about the girl was she was in love with him too (which I assumed to be true from the way it was being told, just like I assume it in pretty much every other love song where someone says the other person also loves them)...I don't think he said much else. How was he objectifying her? I guess the "she will go anywhere I go line" could be interpreted that way. I didn't see it that way. Some people are like that.

...I guess a lot really depends on your initial approach, huh?