fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #3187 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3187 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04. http://i.imgur.com/HcehdSi.jpg
[linked for nudity, it's the blurred lines video]

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

[New Tricks]

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12. [SPOILERS for Jurassic World]

__________________________________________________

13. [WARNING for underage]

__________________________________________________

14. [WARNING for suicide]

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #455.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

da

I mean, both are nasty, but one involves raping an animal, the other doesn't. That's kind of a huge distinction to me.

Ok if someone puts their dick in my mouth I totally won't call it rape.

It was (allegedly) a dead pig.

and people like, eat dead pigs.

if he had put his dick in a steak and ale pie, would you be outraged?

If someone stuck your dick in the mouth of a dead person, wouldn't you be kind of disgusted?

Stuck *their* dick, not your dick. But maybe your dick. If it's like a weird serial killer guy or something.

Yeah, I'd be disgusted. Just like I'm disgusted by the allegations with the dead pig. I'm actually horrified, at the existence of offensive casual sex pranks, treatment of the dead and animals. But it's not rape. And considering what typically happens to dead pigs anyway - and actually, live pigs in factory farms - I think the line of humane treatment of animals is generally already crossed.

Are you the "raping an animal" anon or not?

ayrt Someone above claimed that moving your dick in and out of a dead animal was rape, but Cameron didn't. Hence "huge distinction". Whereas here you're saying they're dead anyway and it's all a big violation, which is something different, so I wondered if you were the same person.

Someone earlier distinguished between "fucking a pig" and putting a dick inside a dead pig's mouth. Another anon tried to minimize the distinction. I pointed out that there's a big difference in that one was rape (which is, having sex with a live pig) and one was not (that is, putting your dick inside the mouth of a dead pig). Anon tried to argue that the latter was rape too. I disagreed. Anon argued that it's disgusting. I agreed.

Rape of a dead pig is something I think is a thing. You don't?

How can you rape something inanimate? There's no actual victim. If you want to use the word rape, sure, it's descriptive enough in this case, but no victim is suffering, being taken advantage of, put through pain/humiliation, etc. Even if you want to call it rape, fine, but it's not the same as actual rape, and it's a huge difference.

fresh dead or rotten one?

and which bet a question, did he cook and eat the thing after that?

You're shifting the goalposts. So now because it's *dead* it's okay, and the "huge distinction" isn't?

*lololololololol best conversation*

Hi, Mark!

ayrt Don't get the reference -?

[ SECRET POST #3187 ]

Re: Oink

Re: Oink

Re: Oink

Re: Oink

Re: Oink

Re: Oink

Re: Oink

Re: Oink

Re: Oink

Re: Oink

Re: Oink

Re: Oink

Re: Oink

Re: Oink

Re: Oink

Re: Oink