[ SECRET POST #3187 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3187 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. http://i.imgur.com/HcehdSi.jpg
[linked for nudity, it's the blurred lines video]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.
[New Tricks]


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12. [SPOILERS for Jurassic World]



__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for underage]



__________________________________________________



14. [WARNING for suicide]















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #455.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: So you can have a choice

[(Anonymous)]

Out of curiosity, what is it if he says he knows where you live and when you come and go and will be waiting for you to punch you in the face?

Re: So you can have a choice

[(Anonymous)]

I don't know all of the case law, so this is just a guess.

That is not an assault. From the way I understand it, it has to be a present, immediate threat. "I'm going to punch you later" is not an assault. "I'm going to punch you right now, I can punch you, and I have the physical ability to do it right now" is an assault.

Re: So you can have a choice

[ill_omened]

Probably section 4A (possibly 4 if there was more than merely words) public order.

Dependent upon location of course. Very rare that would constitute assault as legaly defined in any country with case law and not fall under a seperate offence.

Re: So you can have a choice

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT

Isn't that only in English law? In the law of the United States (which I was talking about above) there intentional infliction of emotional distress, which is similar but very, very rarely is a plaintiff allowed to recover.