case: ([ Zell; Sleepy. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2008-02-10 05:08 pm

[ SECRET POST #401 ]


⌈ Secret Post #401 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.


__________________________________________________



2.


__________________________________________________



3.


__________________________________________________



4.


__________________________________________________



5.


__________________________________________________



6.


__________________________________________________



7.


__________________________________________________



8.


__________________________________________________



9.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.


__________________________________________________



23.


__________________________________________________



24.


__________________________________________________



25.


__________________________________________________



26.


__________________________________________________



27.


__________________________________________________



28.


__________________________________________________



29.


__________________________________________________



30.


__________________________________________________



31.


__________________________________________________



32.


__________________________________________________



33.


__________________________________________________



34.


__________________________________________________



35.


__________________________________________________



36.


__________________________________________________



37.


__________________________________________________



38.


__________________________________________________



39.


__________________________________________________



40.


__________________________________________________



41.


__________________________________________________



42.


__________________________________________________



43.


__________________________________________________



44.


__________________________________________________



45.


__________________________________________________



46.


__________________________________________________



47.


__________________________________________________



48.


__________________________________________________



49.


__________________________________________________



50.


__________________________________________________



51.


__________________________________________________



52.


__________________________________________________



53.


__________________________________________________



54.


__________________________________________________



55.


__________________________________________________



56.


__________________________________________________



57.


__________________________________________________



58.


__________________________________________________



59.


__________________________________________________



60.


__________________________________________________



61.


__________________________________________________



62.


__________________________________________________



63.


__________________________________________________



64.


__________________________________________________



65.


__________________________________________________



66.


__________________________________________________



67.


__________________________________________________





Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 16 pages, 384 secrets from Secret Submission Post #058.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 ] broken links, [ 1 2 3 4 5 ] not!secrets, [ 1 ] not!fandom, [ 1 ] too big, [ 1 2 3 ] repeat.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Monday, February 11th, 2008.
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
herongale: (Default)

Re: tl;dr comment to 27

[personal profile] herongale 2008-02-11 06:19 am (UTC)(link)
I know you were not talking about fanfiction. But a bad original character is a bad original character, whether it occurs in fanfiction or in an original story. Either Mary Sues can exist in both formats, or they exist in neither. It is illogical to state that a character in an original piece of fiction cannot exhibit the traits of a Sue just because she happens to come with her own special little world. It's not the WORLD that defines a "Sue," but rather characteristics native to the OC.

All I'm saying is that either Mary Sues can exist across all forms of fiction, or they don't exist at all. There is nothing that requires them to be tied to derivative fanworks only.

Although it might hurt your feelings to have your favourite characters called "Sues," and although perhaps at least half the time those accusations are meritless, it does not follow that there are NO such things as Canon Sues. All it means is that the term is overused.

And I really don't buy the argument that female characters are disproportionately targeted. Some people, I'm sure, are sexist about this. But I don't think it's actually as prevalent as people like to imagine; everyone I know (including myself) who uses the Canon Sue label is just as quick to call someone a Canon Stu. A good many of my favourite anime series involve characters who are indisputably Canon Stus.

I suspect that your experience reflects your fannish preferences; you might see it more with female characters, perhaps because you pay more attention to those characters than other fans might. Slash fen are more likely to notice Canon Stus, for example, since they tend to prefer male characters.

The anon who posted the secret originally under discussion was saying that he/she looks down on people who think Canon Sues exist. I was not suggesting you said that, but since it WAS said, I think that point deserves to be countered. Anyone is free to look down on anyone for any reason, of course: but no one has to agree that said reasons are logical or fair.

Re: tl;dr comment to 27

[identity profile] demyx.livejournal.com 2008-02-11 06:34 am (UTC)(link)
Ah, I see your point now. And yeah, that is a damn good argument, one that I can't really counter, heh. My original point was that the term is overused, yeah, but I do know I can't say canon sues don't exist (I don't ever say a character is a Sue/Stu, I say they're poorly written, so I think I'm just calling them the same thing under a different title. Hm...)

I didn't agree with the original sentiments that people who think canon sues exist were wrong though, or that they were sexist, I just agreed that the term was thrown away WAY too much. But the heart of my comment was sort of "Yeah, female characters get shafted, rargh!".

Thank you for the discussion though! (not being sarcastic XD;) You are right, and I think I might have to renounce my opinion since I can't really think of any counter-argument on that, and well... I kinda agree. and besides, just because a character is a "Sue" doesn't necessarily mean people would hate them. I saw more than one secret about how people sometimes prefer "perfect" characters, so maybe the label isn't as bad as I think anyway.