case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-10-10 04:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #3202 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3202 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: TW: Rape

(Anonymous) 2015-10-10 08:47 pm (UTC)(link)
you're both drunk, but you're just dumb drunk and she's black out drunk. you get consent, but she's too drunk for the consent to be meaningful and you're too drunk to tell the difference. She's incapacitated and you are not. that is accidental rape.

Re: TW: Rape

(Anonymous) 2015-10-10 08:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I think in the scenario you're outlining both people would have to be considered too drunk to consent and it's hard for me to consider such a scenario rape.

Re: TW: Rape

(Anonymous) 2015-10-10 08:57 pm (UTC)(link)
the man in that scenario would not have been too drunk to consent. sober enough to perform for a man isn't blackout drunk. sober enough to perform is sober enough to know what is happening. but the woman could be saying yes to anything in that scenario, not the sex. there's a value difference at play, and sober enough to consent for one person but drunk enough to not understand how drunk the other person is would be accidental rape.

i don't mean this to sound like i'm making excuses or being an apologist, i know it's still rape and there should be no lenience for the guy but at the same tine i don't think we can conclude the intention to do harm was there.

Re: TW: Rape

(Anonymous) 2015-10-10 08:59 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't agree that a man who is physically able to have sex is necessarily sober enough to provide informed consent. I am fairly certain that is not true.

Re: TW: Rape

(Anonymous) 2015-10-10 09:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Legally it is. And I think morally it is too. but you're free to disagree with me.

Re: TW: Rape

(Anonymous) 2015-10-11 04:48 am (UTC)(link)
Er, whaaat? You're saying any man who is drunk but can still get a boner... can consent? wtf.
insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

Re: TW: Rape

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2015-10-10 09:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Even the dead can get boners. (No lie, it's true).
Edited 2015-10-10 21:16 (UTC)

Re: TW: Rape

(Anonymous) 2015-10-10 08:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I think that's so silly because they're basically raping each other in that scenario.

Re: TW: Rape

(Anonymous) 2015-10-10 10:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Not really.