case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-10-10 04:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #3202 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3202 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

(Anonymous) 2015-10-10 09:24 pm (UTC)(link)
SA, Is this a misfire?

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

(Anonymous) 2015-10-10 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)
"Surely there must be some women characters that do don't deserve this treatment?"

"women characters"

No, not a misfire. It's not about "some characters" based on age or anything universal, but about "women characters". It's pretty obviously meant to sound the way it does. That being said I'm not going to reply more and feed the troll.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

(Anonymous) 2015-10-10 09:30 pm (UTC)(link)
*Sigh*

And male characters too. Surely there are some characters that do not deserve this treatment. I said women because I was talking about susan. But really I don't see anyone rushing to draw Havelock's Dick

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

(Anonymous) 2015-10-10 09:34 pm (UTC)(link)
>really I don't see anyone rushing to draw Havelock's Dick

are you sure about that because vetinari gets slashed all the time, explicitly, on ao3

https://archiveofourown.org/tags/Havelock%20Vetinari/works

are you just tossing out random accusations?? you don't sound familiar with discworld fandom

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

(Anonymous) 2015-10-10 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Writing a character driven story is different to drawing a sex act, even if the end result in both is titillation.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

(Anonymous) 2015-10-10 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Do you know for a fact that all of those stories are "character driven"?
kitelovesyou: patsy (patsy)

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[personal profile] kitelovesyou 2015-10-11 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
What? Why is it different and why is one more okay than the other?