case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-10-10 04:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #3202 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3202 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2015-10-10 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)
In as much as I think having a positive depiction of sexuality for a female character is totally viable unless they're stated to be asexual, yeah.
dethtoll: (Default)

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[personal profile] dethtoll 2015-10-10 10:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Except I do not believe a positive depiction is possible for Samus. It really isn't a problem on my part if you don't get that.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

(Anonymous) 2015-10-10 10:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I really never knew you were such a misogynist. I guess I just picked a side in the herpy/dethy conflict.

Fuck you.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2015-10-10 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm a misogynist because I think women should be allowed to be portrayed enjoying sex?

Is it opposite day?

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

(Anonymous) 2015-10-10 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Jesus, the mental gymnastics you're capable of is astounding.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2015-10-10 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)
No, really. I'm still waiting for you to tell me how being sex positive makes me a misogynist.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

(Anonymous) 2015-10-10 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Like dethtoll said: you just wouldn't get it. but where dethtoll attributes it to ignorance, I attribute it to malice and misogyny.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2015-10-10 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)
That or you actually don't have an explanation and you just want to scream misogyny at me because you like to troll.

Well, it was fun.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

(Anonymous) 2015-10-11 09:01 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know the source text you're speaking of so I can't pick a side, but it seems like you and dethtoll both have reasonable points. Basically all I'm saying is, sorry about your troll problem. :)

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

(Anonymous) 2015-10-11 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Deathtoll is right, Herpy isn't.