Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-10-10 04:00 pm
[ SECRET POST #3202 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3202 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist
Plus, men aren't the only ones who draw porn (or write smut, etc).
Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist
(Anonymous) 2015-10-11 03:43 pm (UTC)(link)For example, in my fandom, there is a character that reacts quite violently (or with intense blushing) to anything sexual. But in the series finale, she's portrayed as quite happily married and a mother of three. I doubt she had those kids by asexual reproduction...
Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist
Is your fandom an anime? (There's plenty of blushing in anime!)
I doubt she had those kids by asexual reproduction...
Probably not. Of course there are other options like adoption, but those aren't explored as often; I imagine she had the kids. People and circumstances change.
For example, I totally understand not being a fan of smut of a character that is absolutely disgusted by sex (I would think that was OOC as well), but even then I'm going to let those people do their thing and just ignore it.