case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-10-10 04:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #3202 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3202 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

(Anonymous) 2015-10-10 10:30 pm (UTC)(link)
I think that's an egregious example and don't see that particular scenario as in character for her, but I don't necessarily think that Susan is disinterested in sex altogether. You're creating your own interpretation of canon for Susan's sex life. The person who wrote that fic is also doing their own interpretation of canon. That's kind of what fandom and fanfic is all about, right? I think the mistake you're making here is to think that your interpretation is the only correct interpretation.