[ SECRET POST #3202 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3202 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

I agree. Sexual thoughts about pure, innocent underage characters are horrible.

I would never suggest removing their clothes and licking their tiny bodies all over, nibbling their necks and kissing their adorable little nipples. Only a heartless monster would think about their cute mouths and tongues wrapped around a thick cock slick with their saliva, pumping in and out of their mouths until it erupts, the cum more than their little throats can swallow.

The idea of thick viscous semen overflowing, dribbling down their chins over their chests, their tiny hands scooping it all up and watching them absorb it off their fingertips is just horrible. Anyone who does is evil, evil, evil.

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

Ahahaha, you're my favorite. Puritanism has no place in fandom. Porn of everything!

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

Being opposed to pedophilia =/= puritanism.

What the fuck is wrong with you.

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

Hey, calm your tits, we are talking about fictional characters here, no one wants to sexualize real life children.

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

So would you mind explaining how it's "puritanical" to be grossed out by smut of 12-year-olds?

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

It's fictional. Get over it.

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

Okay, let me rephrase that.

Being opposed to smut fanfiction about 12-year-olds =/= puritanism.

Puritanism would be more like "I am grossed out by sex in general and think nobody should write smutty fanfiction."

"I am grossed out by 12-year-olds having sex and think nobody should write smutty fanfiction about that specifically" IS NOT PURITANISM. It is a perfectly normal reaction to a topic that a lot of people find majorly squicky, and with good reason.

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

"I don't like so NO ONE SHOULD WRITE IT".

Okay...

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

Since you completely ignored the point I was trying to make, I'm going to assume you either didn't get it or are being deliberately obtuse.

In case it's the first one, I'll break it down in the simplest terms I possibly can:

A lot of people are disturbed by smut involving children. Some of these people believe that such smut should not be written. This is in no way comparable to people thinking that no one should write ANY sort of smut. Someone who thinks no one should ever write ANY sort of smut can accurately be called puritanical. Someone who is only opposed to smut involving children CANNOT be called puritanical if that is the only type of smut they are opposed to.

Do you understand now?

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

So it's not puritanical as long as you're censoring a kink you dislike and not smut in general.

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

Deliberately obtuse it is, then.

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

no u

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

It's still puritanical to say that anyone shouldn't write a particular kind of smut, even if it offends you. Don't look at it if you don't like it. Some people get their jollies from it, and that's exactly 0% your business.

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

I do not give a shit about what sort of smut people read. What I object to is misuse of the word puritanical. When words are misused they become meaningless.

If you seriously think there's no difference between being offended by smut of children and being offended by smut in general, then there is no point in my debating this with you any further.

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

I COMPLETELY agree with this, and am so glad to hear someone else saying it too. I am extremely open to all kinds of kinky fanworks, but when it involves characters who are significantly underage, I find that incredibly messed up.

Of course, in the country where I live, it's also illegal to write or draw pornographic content of individuals established to be underage. Not that people necessarily get charged for doing it, unless they're distributing that material in mass quantities or whatever, but still. Every since this issue started blowing up in fandom I've been kind of proud to live in a country which actually makes pornographic content depicting underage individuals illegal.

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

I agree that it's not a thought crime to make porn of fictional underage characters, but putting it out there for a general audience without a warning is a dick move. Ur an asshole edgelord, congrats.

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, it is truly nasty how some people fantasize about running their hands all over a 12 years old boy's tiny body while they violate him, feeling his nipples hardening against their tongue as they lick his chest, his neck and his armpits, savoring the scent of his skin and swear while he trembles from the stimulation and as he reaches his climax, hearing him cry out softly as he has his first orgasm while that cock is buried impossibly deep inside him, pulsing violently as an intense amount of hot cum spurts forth and floods through his freshly-deflowered ass for the first time, filling his ass only to spill out of him with a sickening squelch. And as they lie atop his flushed body, he murmurs breathlessly, "Y-You came so much inside of me", then his fingers dig into their back as he feels their cock hardening inside him again.

Truly disgusting.

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt I'm not saying it's "truly nasty" and "truly disgusting" from a moral standpoint, you obtuse dickhead. I'm into all sorts of fucked up shit. What I'm saying is don't put that shit out there for a general audience without some sort of fucking warning.

You're protesting that this is about morality and censorship, but you're actually just stamping your feet and screaming "look at how edgy I ammmm". Yeah yeah we get it.

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

sa I'm not the other anon, if you're conflating our arguments.

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

Looks like you need one





_,-%/%|
_,-' \//%\
_,-' \%/|%
/ / ) __,-- /%\
\__/_,-'%(% ; %)%
%\%, %\
'--%' AsH

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

You're an asshole.

(frozen comment) Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

For god's sake, you're a sick perverts, thinking of spreading his smooth slender thighs, cock poised at the entrance to his pure, tight, virginal asshole, and thrusting in deep as a whimper escapes his lips which are slippery with cum, while his small body shudders from having his anal virginity taken in one quick stroke.

I am even more disgusted at how you'd get even more excited as you lean over him, listening to his quickening breath, his girlish moans and gasps while you hasten your strokes, his sweet pants warm and moist on your face and his flat chest, shiny with a sheen of fresh sweat, rising and falling to meet yours.

(frozen comment) ITT: pedo apologists.

[(Anonymous)]

(frozen comment) ITT: people that don't take fiction so seriously

[(Anonymous)]

(frozen comment) ITT: butthurt pedo apologists.

[(Anonymous)]