[ SECRET POST #3202 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3202 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

No one's saying you can't be sexually attracted to someone you have no romantic interest in, or in love with someone you're not really attracted to, though. That's not what the argument over the split attraction model is. It's over whether or not sexual and romantic identities are necessarily separate from one another, and it carries a lot of really heavy slutshamey baggage.

[kitelovesyou]

Apologies for totally misunderstanding then, I feel like this is part of a wider argument I've missed out on. *looks it up* Oh okay it's a tumblr thing. I'm not going to comment on this until I've read up on it.