[ SECRET POST #3202 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3202 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[kitelovesyou]

I don't get it. How is pointing out that some people experience attraction in different ways homophobic? As a woman, finding myself attracted to someone for the first time without being bogged down in romantic feelings was fucking liberating, and I'm also gay? I mean, that's a reality that many people experience about their sexuality, hell, a lot of bisexual people focus on this when they talk about their sexuality changing over time, or for different genders. It might not happen for your particular sexuality permutation, but suppressing what is an indisputable fact (what you call a "model") about how many people experience their sexualities won't help queers. What is a way/context of phrasing that indisputable fact that you think would harm queers (specifically gay men)?