case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-10-11 03:43 pm

[ SECRET POST #3203 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3203 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Unpopular/Controversial Headcanons

(Anonymous) 2015-10-11 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Um...before this whole "my headcanon is canon OR ELSE/representation headcanons" thing people were able to work with canon in their theories, for the most part. (At least many of the levelheaded people I know)

Also I have , and have seen plenty of headcanons that have nothing to do with themselves.

People just abuse headcanons to make things all about themselves. People abusing headcanons and doing them wrong doesn't make 'headcanoning' wrong itself. Just in the same way that people making bad OCs doesn't make it wrong to create your own character.

SA

(Anonymous) 2015-10-11 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)
"Also I have , and have seen plenty of headcanons that have nothing to do with the creator themselves.