case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-10-11 03:43 pm

[ SECRET POST #3203 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3203 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Unpopular/Controversial Headcanons

(Anonymous) 2015-10-12 06:19 pm (UTC)(link)
I love the instant assumption that I'm talking about one of my fandoms and bellyaching about negative reviews on my stuff. It's wrong--and why am I not surprised that you engaged in a slightly milder version of the sort of behavior I'm describing?

My comment was based on wank that I saw back when I frequented Fanficrants, and what made it all the wankier was that violating the group's shared headcanon was treated as a social justice issue, so at least some members of the group felt entitled to be as hateful as social justice people tend to be when they think they're punching up.
ariakas: (Default)

Re: Unpopular/Controversial Headcanons

[personal profile] ariakas 2015-10-12 06:39 pm (UTC)(link)
lol how is calling what you said an "apocryphal" story an "instant assumption" that you're talking about one of your fandoms?

English! Words! Reading! All good things.

Negative reviews are straight-up "wrong", though. That's a new one. Holy shit. That's the thinnest skin I've seen in a while.

Re: Unpopular/Controversial Headcanons

(Anonymous) 2015-10-12 07:04 pm (UTC)(link)
English! Words! Reading! All good things that you seem to be spectacularly bad at.
ariakas: (Default)

Re: Unpopular/Controversial Headcanons

[personal profile] ariakas 2015-10-12 07:35 pm (UTC)(link)
You tried dude. You tried.
ariakas: (Default)

Re: Unpopular/Controversial Headcanons

[personal profile] ariakas 2015-10-12 06:41 pm (UTC)(link)
((Psst you may want to Google "apocryphal" - it means the exact opposite of of me saying you're talking about your own fandoms. This is, like, English 10, man.))