[ SECRET POST #3207 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3207 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: lisa jaster: What do you all think about her comments?

[(Anonymous)]

Don't know about her comments. But training women for ranger school seems to be pretty worthless compared to men (they require longer training, a greater % fall out, etc). They need to have higher entrance standards so that less fall out and we waste less tax money trying to train them.

sa

[(Anonymous)]

Also, they need to have an age limit on when people can join. 37 is too old to join for men or women. Way less return on your investment.

Re: lisa jaster: What do you all think about her comments?

[(Anonymous)]

You need to fuck off with this "Lets make it harder for women to get in" bullshit.

Re: lisa jaster: What do you all think about her comments?

[(Anonymous)]

Where did I say that? The army does need higher entrance standards to ranger school so that they can cut some of those weak ones out before they start investing in the hardcore training.

Re: lisa jaster: What do you all think about her comments?

[(Anonymous)]

It's not about making it harder for women to get in, it's about demanding that they perform equally to the men.

Re: lisa jaster: What do you all think about her comments?

[(Anonymous)]

Thats still a stacked deck, tho.

Re: lisa jaster: What do you all think about her comments?

[(Anonymous)]

And if they can't do it, they shouldn't be in the army. Period.

Re: lisa jaster: What do you all think about her comments?

[philstar22]

No. Standards should be for who can do the job. If women can't do the job then they shouldn't get the job. But if women actually can do the job but the standards are just set higher than is actually necessary, then the standards need to be more reasonable.

Re: lisa jaster: What do you all think about her comments?

[diet_poison]

this 100%.

Re: lisa jaster: What do you all think about her comments?

[(Anonymous)]

Agreed 100%