[ SECRET POST #3207 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3207 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[sarillia]

I wasn't confused before but I am now. I have no idea how you've interpreted my comment. Yes that is a silly question. It's also not one I asked. The comment I replied to said audiences are "entitled" if they want freedom to interpret the ending the way they want and claim it's canon. I think it's possible to turn that around and say the members of the audience who think this way, who want a completely unambiguous ending, could be called just as entitled for demanding that unambiguous ending and saying the creators are doing it wrong if they don't make it that way. Is that clearer?