case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-10-18 04:13 pm

[ SECRET POST #3210 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3210 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 045 secrets from Secret Submission Post #459.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-10-18 09:10 pm (UTC)(link)
All I could dig up was that the movie was supposed to be very, very different from what we got. It was supposed to be darker with a downer ending (the people of El Dorado were saved, but the city itself was destroyed). One of the writers described "Three Kings" as the movie El Dorado was supposed to be. Reaching from that, one might say it was intended for older children/teenagers, and they might have been more ambiguous about Tulio and Miguel's relationship. I'd provide sauce but I forgot to bookmark it and I can't find it anymore.


The other thing I found is that the English subs in other versions of the movie are supposedly super-slashy. People took that as proof that a last minute effort was made to tone down gay understone during recording of the original dub. However, supposedly it was too late for foreign languages releases who received the slashy, uncensored script. I have no idea if any of this is true.