[ SECRET POST #3212 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3212 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 027 secrets from Secret Submission Post #459.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Look, if you want to stick to copyright laws and all it's fine, but saying first that publishing something based on an out of copyright is something you're ok with and later that "if they want to be professional and paid, they need to come up with their own worlds, their own characters, and their own ideas" it's rather hypocritical.

[mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com]

Then a writer has to come up with a twist on out-of-copyright works that they can call their own. If they have that, they can defend it as their own.

[(Anonymous)]

(ayrt)

The point here is just that the other anon is using a legal difference (whether out of copyright or not) to support a moral objection (writers shouldn't get paid unless they create everything), which contradicts their exception.