case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-10-21 06:47 pm

[ SECRET POST #3213 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3213 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Downton Abbey]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Vampire Weekend]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.
[John Green/Nerdfighters]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Spartacus: Blood and Sand]


__________________________________________________



08.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #459.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-10-21 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)
While I personally don't care for the style, I can see why it's successful from a commercial point of view. Roach's books are typically one-word titles, and the artwork is supposed to hint at the subject matter in such a way that it's clear and not too elaborate. Detailed covers don't look good as thumbprints, and if you want to catch the eye of an online browser, you need something like this. I see it more as an achievement in graphic design than art.